You're currently signed in as:
User

HOSPICIO NILO v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2006-12-18
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
We come to the second ground raised by the petitioner. Petitioner argues that Rodil Enterprises is guilty of forum shopping when it filed the Petition for Certiorari with the Court of Appeals, docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 79157,[32] after it filed an Appeal with the appellate court in CA-G.R. SP No. 34586.[33] Forum shopping is the act of a party against whom an adverse judgment has been rendered in one forum, seeking another and possibly favorable opinion in another forum other than by appeal or special civil action of certiorari.[34]