Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 194024 2012-04-25	PHILIP L. GO v. DISTINCTION PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT MENDOZA, J.
Finally, petitioners faulted the CA in not giving respect and even finality to the findings of fact of the HLURB. Their reliance on the case of Dangan v. NLRC,[46] reiterating the well-settled principles involving decisions of administrative agencies, deserves scant consideration as the decision of the HLURB in this case is manifestly not supported by law and jurisprudence.
	GR NO. 148195 2005-05-16	LOPEZ SUGAR CORPORATION v. LEONITO G. FRANCO CALLEJO, SR., J.
In Dangan v. National Labor Relations Commission,[30] the Court ruled that the hiring, firing or demotion of employees is a management prerogative, but is subject to limitations stated in the collective bargaining agreement, if any, or general principles of fair play and justice. Indeed, the Court will not hesitate to strike down a redundancy program structured by a corporation to downsize its personnel, solely for the purpose of weakening the union leadership, thereby preventing it from securing reasonable terms and conditions of employment in their CBA with the employer.