You're currently signed in as:
User

LEONARDO AMPER v. PRESIDING JUDGE

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2006-05-02
CORONA, J.
We agree that CA 141 was inapplicable. The proscription under CA 141 on re-sale within the five-year restricted period referred to free patents and homestead lands only.[11] Here, the lot in dispute was neither homestead land nor one acquired