This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-10-17 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Considering the foregoing, plus taking judicial notice of the general practice in private, as well as in government institutions and industries, of hiring an independent contractor to perform special services,[56] ranging from janitorial, security and even technical services, we can only conclude that HI is a legitimate job contractor. As such legitimate job contractor, the law creates an employer-employee relationship between HI and petitioners[57] which renders HI liable for the latter's claims. | |||||