Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 160422 2010-07-05	MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SPS. EDITO AND FELICIDAD CHUA BRION, J.
However, moral damages, which are left largely to the sound discretion of the courts, should be granted in reasonable amounts, considering the attendant facts and circumstances.[51] Moral damages, though incapable of pecuniary estimation, are designed to compensate the claimant for actual injury suffered and not to impose a penalty.[52] As prevailing jurisprudence[53] deems the award of moral damages in the amount of P100,000.00 appropriate in cases where MERALCO wrongfully disconnected electric service, we uphold the CA ruling, reducing the moral damages awarded from P300,000.00 to P100,000.00.
	GR NO. 148418 2005-08-28	PCL SHIPPING PHILIPPINES v. NLRC CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
PCL elevated the case to the Court of Appeals via a Petition for Certiorari[10] under Rule 65.[11] In a decision[12] dated 01 December 2000, the Court of Appeals held:
	GR No. 148418 2005-07-28	PCL SHIPPING PHILIPPINES v. NLRC CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
PCL elevated the case to the Court of Appeals via a Petition for Certiorari[10] under Rule 65.[11] In a decision[12] dated 01 December 2000, the Court of Appeals held: