This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2015-02-03 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| RP Energy presented five witnesses, namely: (1) Junisse P. Mercado (Ms. Mercado), an employee of GHD and the Project Director of ongoing projects for RP Energy regarding the proposed power plant project;[44] (2) Juha Sarkki (Engr. Sarkki), a Master of Science degree holder in Chemical Engineering;[45] (3) Henry K. Wong, a degree holder of Bachelor of Science Major in Mechanical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute;[46] (4) Dr. Ely Anthony R. Ouano (Dr. Ouano), a licensed Chemical Engineer, Sanitary Engineer, and Environmental Planner in the Philippines;[47] and (5) David C. Evangelista (Mr. Evangelista), a Business Development Analyst working for RP Energy.[48] | |||||
|
2003-10-16 |
DAVIDE JR., C.J. |
||||
| Under similar facts in People v. Gavina[23] and People v. Peligro,[24] the Court held that the absence of a weapon or anything that could produce sufficient fear in a woman as to render helpless one who would otherwise be deemed strong or worldly enough to put up a fight, or the failure to show the disparity in strength between the complainant and the accused sufficient to overpower a complainant into acceding to the sexual act is deemed a failure on the part of the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused "beyond peradventure of doubt."[25] | |||||
|
2003-07-10 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| 96-37. Section 4[18] of PD No. 1586 requires a proponent of an environmentally critical project, or a project located within an environmentally critical area as declared by the President, to secure an ECC prior to the project's operation.[19] NAPOCOR thus secured the ECC because the mooring facility in Minolo Cove, while not an environmentally critical project, is located within an environmentally critical area under Presidential Proclamation No. 2146, issued on 14 December 1981.[20] The rules on administrative appeals from rulings of the DENR Regional Directors on the implementation of PD No. 1586 are found in Article VI of DAO 96-37, which provides: SECTION 1.0. Appeal to the Office of the Secretary. Any party aggrieved by the final decision of the RED may, within 15 days from receipt of such decision, file an appeal with the Office of the Secretary. The decision of the Secretary shall be immediately | |||||