You're currently signed in as:
User

CARLOS GELANO v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2013-01-21
PERALTA, J.
Incidentally, on July 16, 2009, the Company filed a Manifestation[15] informing this Court that its stockholders and directors unanimously voted to shorten the Company's corporate existence only until June 30, 2006, and that the three-year period allowed by law for liquidation of the Company's affairs already expired on June 30, 2009. Referring to Gelano v. Court of Appeals,[16] Public Interest Center, Inc. v. Elma,[17] and Atienza v. Villarosa,[18] it urged Us, however, to still resolve the case for future guidance of the bench and the bar as the issue raised herein allegedly calls for a clarification of a legal principle, specifically, whether the VA is empowered to rule on a matter not covered by the issue submitted for arbitration.