This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-02-11 |
PANGANIBAN, J. |
||||
| As regards Item 2, there are exceptions to the general rule barring a review of questions of fact.[19] The Court reviewed the factual findings in the present case, because the CA had manifestly overlooked certain relevant and undisputed facts which, after being considered, justified a different conclusion.[20] | |||||