This case has been cited 4 times or more.
|
2016-01-11 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| The Philippine Ports Authority was subsequently given police authority through Executive Order No. 513,[108] which provides: Sec. 2. Section 6 is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph to read as follows: | |||||
|
2008-07-16 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| Turning to the case at bar, Congress undoubtedly has power over the subject matter of the JPEPA,[112] as this agreement touches on the fixing of "tariff rates, import and export quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues, and other duties or imposts." Congress can, in fact, revoke or amend the power of the President to fix these as authorized by law or the Tariff and Customs Code of 1978. Congress can legislate and conduct an inquiry in aid of legislation on this subject matter, as it did pursuant to House Resolution No. 551. The purpose of the legislative inquiry in which the subject JPEPA documents are needed is to aid legislation, which is different from the purpose of the negotiations conducted by the Executive, which is to conclude a treaty. Exercised within their proper limits, the power of the House of Representatives to conduct a legislative inquiry in aid of legislation and the power of the executive to negotiate a treaty should not collide with each other. | |||||
|
2000-08-16 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| Upon arraignment, accused pleaded not guilty to the charges.[4] Trial thereafter ensued, after which the Regional Trial Court of Cabanatuan City, Branch 25, rendered judgment[5] against accused, the dispositive portion of which | |||||