This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-08-20 |
PERLAS-BERNABE, J. |
||||
| For their part, respondents, in their Answer,[11] averred that the complaint stated no cause of action, considering that Lourdes has no standing to question their possession of the subject property as she had already donated her portion in favor of Cecilia,[12] adding too that the latter is bound by her declaration that "the house and lot belong[s] to Eddie," who is Norma's late husband.[13] Respondents further asserted that there was no compliance with the required conciliation and mediation under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law[14] as no Certificate to File Action was attached to the complaint,[15] thereby rendering the complaint dismissible. | |||||