You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

CONSTANTE PIMENTEL v. RUBEN DE LA CRUZ

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM NO. RTJ-04-1823
2006-08-28
ARCELY Y. SANTOS v. JUDGE UBALDINO A. LACUROM
CARPIO, J.
Besides, complainant did not follow the proper procedure for the disqualification of judges. In Constante v. Pimentel,[35] the Court ruled that the procedure for disqualification of judges in Section 2, Rule 137[36] must be substantially followed.