This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-06-09 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| Preliminarily, we note that the resolution of the issue in this case requires a reevaluation of the probative value of the evidence presented by the parties in order to trace the title of the disputed property. What is involved is indeed a question of fact which is generally beyond the jurisdiction of this Court to resolve in a petition for review on certiorari.[12] However, a recognized exception to the rule is when the RTC and CA have conflicting findings of fact as in this case.[13] Here, while the trial court ruled that the disputed property belonged to the conjugal partnership of the first marriage of Pedro Calalang with Encarnacion Silverio, the court a quo declared that the evidence proved the sole and exclusive ownership of the disputed property of Pedro Calalang. | |||||