This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-07-01 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| It has been repeatedly ruled that where documentary evidence was rejected by the lower court and the offeror did not move that the same be attached to the record, the same cannot be considered by the appellate court,[16] as documents forming no part of proofs before the appellate court cannot be considered in disposing the case.[17] For the appellate court to consider as evidence, which was not offered by one party at all during the proceedings below, would infringe the constitutional right of the adverse party - in this case, the CIR, to due process of law. | |||||