This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-09-21 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| To support her argument that government employees who have been separated can no longer be administratively charged, petitioner cites the following cases: Diamalon v. Quintillian,[28] Vda. de Recario v. Aquino,[29] Zamudio v. Penas, Jr.,[30] Pardo v. Cunanan,[31] and Mendoza v. Tiongson.[32] A piecemeal reference to these cases is too insubstantial to support the petitioner's allegation that her separation from government service serves as a bar against the filing of an administrative case for acts she committed as an appointive government official. In order to understand the Court's pronouncement in these cases, they must be examined in their proper contexts. | |||||