You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

RUFINA DEL ROSARIO VDA. DE ROSARIO v. CA SPECIAL SEVENTH DIVISION MANILA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 170645
2010-07-09
NIEVES ESTARES BALDOS v. CA
CARPIO, J.
In its 8 August 2005 Decision,[9] the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's Order. The appellate court held that P.D. No. 651 did not proscribe the late registration of births of persons born before 1 January 1974. The Court of Appeals explained that the purpose of the decree was to encourage registration of births as well as deaths.