This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2001-08-20 |
PANGANIBAN, J. |
||||
| This is the main question raised in the Petition for Review before us, assailing the November 20, 1992 Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals[2] (CA) in CA-GR CV No. 18444. The CA affirmed the May 25, 1988 Order[3] of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Negros Occidental (Branch 52),[4] which voided the owner's duplicate copy of TCT No. T-120163 and ordered the Register of Deeds to annotate, in the Original Certificate of Title, the final Certificate of Sale in favor of private respondent, without the need of presenting the owner's duplicate copy. | |||||
|
2001-01-24 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
| On September 30, 1964, the heirs executed an extra-judicial partition[5] of the estate of Paulino Fajardo. On the same date, Manuela sold her share to Moses[6] G. Mendoza, husband of Beatriz by deed of absolute sale.[7] The description of the property reads as follows:"A parcel of an irrigated riceland located in the barrio of San Isidro, Masantol, Pampanga. Bounded on the North, by Paulino Fajardo; on the East, by Paulino Fajardo; on the South, by Eleuterio Bautista; and on the West, by Paulino Guintu. Containing an area of 5,253 sq. mts., more or less. Declared under Tax Declaration No. 3029 in the sum of P710.00." At the time of the sale, there was no cadastral survey in Masantol, Pampanga. Later, the cadastre was conducted, and the property involved in the partition case were specified as Lots 280, 283, 284, 1000-A and 1000-B. The share of Manuela, which was sold to Moses, includes Lot 284 of the Masantol Cadastre and Lot 284 was subdivided into Lots 284-A and 284-B. | |||||