Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 177667 2008-09-17	CLEODIA U. FRANCISCO v. SPS. JORGE C. GONZALES AND PURIFICACION W. GONZALES AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
To hold the property in Taal St. liable for the obligations of Michele and Matrai would be going against the spirit and avowed objective of the Civil Code to give the utmost concern for the solidarity and well-being of the family as a unit.[31]
	GR NO. 153979 2006-02-09	REGINO SY CATIIS v. CA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
[18] Luzon Surety Co., Inc. v. De Garcia, 140 Phil. 509, 514 (1969).
	GR No. 127882 2004-12-01	LA BUGAL-B’LAAN TRIBAL ASSOCIATION v. VICTOR O. RAMOS PANGANIBAN, J.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the three options or formulae do not yet take into account the indirect taxes[70] and other financial contributions[71] of mining projects. These indirect taxes and other contributions are real and actual benefits enjoyed by the Filipino people and/or government. Now, if some of the quantifiable items are taken into account in the computations, the financial modeling would show that the total government share increases to 60 percent or higher -- in one instance, as much as 77 percent and even 89 percent -- of the net present value of total benefits from the project. As noted in the Ramos-DeVera paper, these results are not at all shabby, considering that the contractor puts in all the capital requirements and assumes all the risks, without the government having to contribute or risk anything.