This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2010-07-05 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| For a writ of mandamus to issue, the applicant must have a well-defined, clear, and certain legal right to the thing demanded. The corresponding duty of the respondent to perform the required act must be equally clear.[33] No such clarity exists here; neither does petitioner's right to demand a revision of her examination results. And despite petitioner's assertions that she has not made any demand for re-correction, the most cursory perusal of her Second Amended Petition and her prayer that the respondents "make the appropriate revisions on the results of her examination" belies this claim. | |||||