This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2007-07-10 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| (c) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings; Trial court allowed the filing of an amended answer to avoid multiplicity of suits, to determine the real controversies between the parties and to decide the case on the merits without unnecessary delay, all of which form the bases for the liberality of the rule in allowing amendments to pleadings.[13] This was in consonance with the basic tenet that the Rules of Court shall be liberally construed to promote the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of every action.[14] | |||||
|
2005-11-22 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| As for petitioners' reliance on Art. 1358[22] of the Civil Code, the same is misplaced for the requirement that contracts where the amount involved exceeds P500.00 must appear in writing is only for convenience.[23] | |||||