This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2008-09-17 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| Specifically, the action was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the RTC because it was incapable of pecuniary estimation as provided in Sec. 19 (1) of BP 129,[29] as amended by RA 7691.[30] The basic issue was petitioner's entitlement to the right provided under Sec. 39 of PD 198. Although there was a claim for a sum of money, it was purely incidental to, or a consequence of, the principal relief sought.[31] | |||||