You're currently signed in as:
User

MATEO C. BACALSO v. MODESTO R. RAMOLETE

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2014-06-11
BRION, J.
Furthermore, whether Judge Madrona properly inhibited himself from the case does not pose any jurisdictional problem in resolving the issues in Civil Case No. 05-0265. We agree with Trajano that jurisdiction vests in the trial court, not in the judges. We also point out in this respect that the various branches of the RTC of ParaƱaque are coordinate and co-equal courts whose totality constitutes only one RTC. Each of the RTC's branches is not a court separate and distinct from the other branches. When a complaint is filed before one branch or judge, jurisdiction does not attach to this branch or judge alone, to the exclusion of the others. Trial may be had or proceedings may continue by and before another branch or judge. The different branches in the RTC of ParaƱaque do not possess jurisdictions independent of and incompatible with each other.[63]