Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

ALFONSO BUN RAMOS v. EMILIANO CONDEZ

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR NO. 177348 2008-10-17	SPS. RAMON PATRON AND LUZVIMINDA PATRON v. UNION BANK OF PHILIPPINES CARPIO MORALES, J.
The Spouses Ramon and Luzviminda Patron (petitioners), doing business under the name Ala Golden Grains Rice Mill, obtained on September 9, 1988 a P2,000,000 quedan loan from respondent International Corporate Bank (Interbank) which was guaranteed by respondent Quedan and Rural Credit Guarantee Corporation (Quedancor).[1]
	GR NO. 177348 2008-10-17	SPS. RAMON PATRON AND LUZVIMINDA PATRON v. UNION BANK OF PHILIPPINES CARPIO MORALES, J.
Both cases were consolidated.[14]
	GR NO. 177348 2008-10-17	SPS. RAMON PATRON AND LUZVIMINDA PATRON v. UNION BANK OF PHILIPPINES CARPIO MORALES, J.
Petitioner Ramon Patron's letter to UBP dated January 31, 1994 appealing for a condonation and/or reduction of the penalty charges of 2% per annum on the promissory note for P4,900,000 which matured on August 9, 1993 and requesting a restructuring of said loan,[26] as well as petitioners' counsel's letter to UBP dated January 10, 1994 seeking clarification on "x x x why [Ramon Patron] should be liable for this additional 2% a month beginning August 9, 1993, when the note falls due only on February 4, 1994,"[27] should dissipate any doubts on, and unquestionably reflect the admission by petitioners of, their liability to respondent UBP.
	GR No. 152526 2004-11-25	RAMON R. JIMENEZ JR. v. JUAN JOSE JORDANA PANGANIBAN, J.
To sustain a motion to dismiss, the movant needs to show that the plaintiff's claim for relief does not exist at all. On the contrary, the complaint is sufficient "if it contains sufficient notice of the cause of action even though the allegations may be vague or indefinite, in which event, the proper recourse would be, not a motion to dismiss, but a motion for a bill of particulars."[15]