This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-03-14 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| (c) If there is no such creditor competent and willing to serve, it may be granted to such other person as the court may select. However, this Court has consistently ruled that the order of preference in the appointment of a regular administrator as provided in the afore-quoted provision does not apply to the selection of a special administrator.[13] The preference under Section 6, Rule 78 of the Rules of Court for the next of kin refers to the appointment of a regular administrator, and not of a special administrator, as the appointment of the latter lies entirely in the discretion of the court, and is not appealable.[14] | |||||