You're currently signed in as:
User

LEDESMA DE JESUS-PARAS v. QUINCIANO VAILOCES

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2009-04-28
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Abduction with consent[37] Bigamy[38] Concubinage[39] Smuggling[40] Rape[41] Estafa through falsification of a document[42] Attempted Bribery[43] Profiteering[44] Robbery[45] Murder, whether consummated or attempted[46] Estafa[47] Theft[48] Illicit Sexual Relations with a Fellow Worker[49] Violation of BP Bldg. 22[50] Falsification of Document[51] Intriguing against Honor[52] Violation of the Anti-Fencing Law[53] Violation of Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972 (Drug-pushing)[54] Perjury[55] Forgery[56] Direct Bribery[57] Frustrated Homicide[58]
2007-09-07
CARPIO, J.
A disciplinary action against a lawyer is intended to protect the administration of justice from the misconduct of its officers.  This Court requires that its officers shall be competent, honorable, and reliable men in whom the public may repose confidence.[55] "Lawyers must at all times faithfully perform their duties to society, to the bar, to the courts, and to their clients. Their conduct must always reflect the values and norms of the legal profession as embodied in the Code of Professional Responsibility. On these considerations, the Court may disbar or suspend lawyers for any professional or private misconduct showing them to be wanting in moral character, honesty, probity, and good demeanor or to be unworthy to continue as officers of the Court."[56]