This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-04-26 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| In his Answer filed with the CTA, BIR Commissioner Tan asserted that the Petition stated no cause of action against him, and that private respondent Savellano was already paid the informer's reward due him. Alleging that the Petition was baseless and malicious, BIR Commissioner Tan filed a counterclaim for exemplary damages against private respondent Savellano.[20] | |||||