You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

FILEMON DIONELA v. COURT Of INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR NO. 160391
2005-08-09
DUSIT HOTEL NIKKO v. NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS IN HOTEL
CALLEJO, SR., J.
We reject the contention of the petitioners that respondent Agoncillo is bound by the MOA executed by the petitioners and respondent Union. There is no denying the right of the Union and the petitioners under Article 227 of the Labor Code to enter into and execute a compromise agreement with the assistance of the DOLE; and that such agreement is binding not only on the Union generally but on its individual members.[40]