This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-12-03 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Assailed in these consolidated petitions for review on certiorari filed under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court are the August 30, 2002 Decision[1] and the January 16, 2003 Resolution[2] of the Sandiganbayan in Criminal Case No. 18684, which found accused Luis D. Montero (Montero), Alfredo Y. Perez (Perez) and Alejandro C. Rivera (Rivera), guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of violation of Section 3 (e) of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 3019, otherwise known as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.[3] | |||||
|
2008-12-08 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| In Macias v. COMELEC,[28] we first jurisprudentially acknowledged the American roots of our apportionment provision, noting its roots from the | |||||