This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-12-03 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| When a provision is susceptible of two interpretations, "the one that will render them operative and effective and harmonious with other provisions of law"[39] should be adopted. As the interpretations in the assailed Decision and in Mr. Justice Tinga's ponencia are the ones that would not make the subject Presidential Warranty unconstitutional, these are what we shall adopt. | |||||