This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-10-30 |
VELASCO, JR., J. |
||||
| Addressing as well the second issue, the CA cited Lancita v. Magbanua,[10] where we invoked equity in the computation of the five (5)-year period through the implementation of a decision by means of a motion; and ruled that the delays brought by the stay in the execution "either by agreement of the parties for a definite time, by injunction, by the taking of an appeal or writ of error so as to operate as a supersedeas, by the death of a party, or otherwise" or "[a]ny interruption or delay occasioned by the debtor will extend the time within which the writ may be issued x x x." | |||||