Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 182424 2014-09-22	NENITA CARGANILLO v. PEOPLE BRION, J.
For fraud to vitiate consent, the deception employed must be the causal (dolo causante) inducement to the making of the contract,[19] and must be serious in character.[20] It must be sufficient to impress or lead an ordinarily prudent person into error, taking into account the circumstances of each case.[21]
	GR No. 167874 2010-01-15	SPS. CARMEN S. TONGSON AND JOSE C. TONGSON SUBSTITUTED BY HIS CHILDREN NAMELY: JOSE TONGSON v. EMERGENCY PAWNSHOP BULA CARPIO, J.
Under Article 1338 of the Civil Code, there is fraud when, through insidious words or machinations of one of the contracting parties, the other is induced to enter into a contract which, without them, he would not have agreed to. In order that fraud may vitiate consent, it must be the causal (dolo causante), not merely the incidental (dolo incidente), inducement to the making of the contract.[19] Additionally, the fraud must be serious.[20]