You're currently signed in as:
User

ESTATE OP K. H. HBMADY v. LUZON SURETY CO.

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2009-08-24
PUNO, C.J.
In Estate of Hemady v. Luzon Surety Co., Inc.,[26] the Court, through Justice JBL Reyes, held: While in our successional system the responsibility of the heirs for the debts of their decedent cannot exceed the value of the inheritance they receive from him, the principle remains intact that these heirs succeed not only to the rights of the deceased but also to his obligations. Articles 774 and 776 of the New Civil Code (and Articles 659 and 661 of the preceding one) expressly so provide, thereby confirming Article 1311 already quoted.
2009-07-24
In Estate of Hemady v. Luzon Surety Co., Inc.,[26] the Court, through Justice JBL Reyes, held: While in our successional system the responsibility of the heirs for the debts of their decedent cannot exceed the value of the inheritance they receive from him, the principle remains intact that these heirs succeed not only to the rights of the deceased but also to his obligations. Articles 774 and 776 of the New Civil Code (and Articles 659 and 661 of the preceding one) expressly so provide, thereby confirming Article 1311 already quoted.