This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2004-02-05 |
PANGANIBAN, J. |
||||
| In effect, the rule on the concurrence of the offer and its acceptance[54] did not apply, because other matters or details in addition to the subject matter and the consideration would still be stipulated and agreed upon by the parties.[55] While there was an initial offer made, there was no acceptance; but when there allegedly came an acceptance that could have had a binding effect, the offer was already lacking. The offer and its acceptance "did not meet to give birth to a contract."[56] | |||||