You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. NICASIO YATCO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2001-10-02
PANGANIBAN, J.
Fortunately for respondent's cause, when the divorce decree of May 18, 1989 was submitted in evidence, counsel for petitioner objected, not to its admissibility, but only to the fact that it had not been registered in the Local Civil Registry of Cabanatuan City.[36] The trial court ruled that it was admissible, subject to petitioner's qualification.[37] Hence, it was admitted in evidence and accorded weight by the judge.  Indeed, petitioner's failure to object properly rendered the divorce decree admissible as a written act of the Family Court of Sydney, Australia.[38]