This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2000-04-27 |
BUENA, J. |
||||
| In the final analysis, the shooting of Dazo was done in order to defend the possession of the stolen property.[46] It was therefore an act which tended to insure the successful termination of the robbery and secure to the robber the possession and enjoyment of the goods taken.[47] Accused-appellant's argument that the element of "taking" was not proved is thus unavailing in the face of Tulod's testimony. | |||||