You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

AMANDA MADAMBA VDA. DE ADIARTE v. EMILIANA TUMANENG

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 159571
2005-07-15
DELFINA VDA. DE RIGONAN AND SPS. VALERIO LAUDE AND VISMINDA LAUDE v. ZOROASTER DERECHO REPRESENTING HEIRS OF RUBEN DERECHO
PANGANIBAN, J.
This purchase cannot be considered as a redemption in the concept of a pacto de retro sale, which would imply that the period to redeem was extended long after it had already expired.  Such automatic extension is  not possible because, as succinctly stated by Manresa, "if the extension is made after the expiration of the period, then it is void and of no effect because there is nothing to extend."[38]