This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2001-08-10 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
| Any agreement entered into because of the actual or supposed influence which the party has, engaging him to influence executive officials in the discharge of their duties, which contemplates the use of personal influence and solicitation rather than an appeal to the judgment of the official on the merits of the object sought is contrary to public policy.[39] Consequently, the agreement, assuming that the parties agreed to the consultancy, is null and void as against public policy.[40] Therefore, it is unenforceable before a court of justice.[41] | |||||