Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 149453 2003-10-07	PEOPLE v. PANFILO M. LACSON CALLEJO, SR., J.
Besides, the respondent sought the inhibition of Justices Conchita C. Morales and Adolfo S. Azcuna only after they had already concurred in the Court's Resolution dated April 1, 2003. Case law has it that a motion for disqualification must be denied when filed after a member of the Court has already given an opinion on the merits of the case, the rationale being that a litigant cannot be permitted to speculate upon the action of the Court, only to raise an objection of this sort after a decision has been rendered.[11]