This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2000-01-20 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| The record also reveals inculpatory facts and circumstances capable of two or more explanations, one of them consistent with the guilt of the accused and the other one consistent with innocence. It is the rule in such cases that we acquit the accused on grounds of reasonable doubt. The ambivalent evidence does not fulfill the test of moral certainty. It is not sufficient to sustain a conviction.[3] | |||||