This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-07-06 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| Before the Court of Appeals (CA),[10] petitioners questioned the credibility of Villostas and Penilla as prosecution witnesses. They pointed out inconsistencies in their testimonies respecting the victim's degree of intoxication at the time of the incident, the kind or brand of liquor that he imbibed, and the length of time that he had been drinking immediately prior thereto. Petitioners argued that such inconsistencies rendered doubtful their identification as the culprits by said prosecution witnesses. | |||||