Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 179756 2009-10-02	RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION v. ROYAL CARGO CORPORATION CARPIO MORALES, J.
In its Comment,[29] respondent reiterates that the respective decisions of the appellate court and this Court in CA G.R. SP No. 31125 and G.R. No. 115662 are conclusive between the parties, hence, "the right of [respondent] to a [ten-day] notice has a binding effect and must be adopted in any other controversy between the same parties in which the very same question is raised."[30]