Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 189125 2013-08-28	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. BIENVENIDO CASTRO PEREZ, J.
The fundamental doctrine that private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation requires that the owner shall receive the market value of his property at the time of the taking, unaffected by any subsequent change in the condition of the property.[35]
	GR No. 166973 2009-02-10	NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. BENJAMIN ONG CO TINGA, J.
Typically, the time of taking is contemporaneous with the time the petition is filed. The general rule is what is provided for by Rule 67. There are exceptions--grave injustice to the property owner,[32] the taking did not have color of legal authority,[33] the taking of the property was not initially for expropriation[34] and the owner will be given undue increment advantages because of the expropriation.[35] However, none of these exceptions are present in the instant case.