Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 126297 2010-02-02	PROFESSIONAL SERVICES v. CA CORONA, J.
PSI, Dr. Ampil and Dr. Fuentes appealed[44] from the RTC decision but only on the issues of negligence, agency and corporate liability. In its September 6, 1996 decision, the CA mistakenly referred to PSI and Dr. Ampil as employer-employee, but it was clear in its discussion on the matter that it viewed their relationship as one of mere apparent agency.[45]
	GR No. 149803 2002-01-31	DATU ANDAL S. AMPATUAN v. COMELEC PARDO, J.
On May 23, 2001, respondents filed a petition with the Comelec for the annulment of election results and/or declaration of failure of elections[6] in several municipalities[7] in the province of Maguindanao. They claimed that the elections "were completely sham and farcical." The ballots were filled-up en masse by a few persons the night before election day, and in some precincts, the ballot boxes, official ballots and other election paraphernalia were not delivered at all.[8]