This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2004-03-17 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| themselves, who denied the claim and declared that the same is "merely a product of [complainant's] imagination done in retaliation for the several instances we required him to pay the correct taxes and duties for articles the release of which he facilitated at the Arrival Area, NAIA."[16] The duty of the Court towards members of the bar is not only limited to the administration of discipline to those found culpable of misconduct but also to the protection of the reputation of those frivolously or maliciously charged.[17] In disbarment | |||||