Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PETRONILO VALENZUELA ET AL. v. VICENTE LOPEZ ET AL.

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 146839 2011-03-23	ROLANDO T. CATUNGAL v. ANGEL S. RODRIGUEZ LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
On December 23, 1991, the Catungals filed a motion for reconsideration[33] of the December 20, 1991 Order denying their Urgent Motion to Dismiss but the trial court denied reconsideration in an Order dated February 3, 1992.[34] Undeterred, the Catungals subsequently filed a Motion to Lift and to Set Aside Order of Default[35] but it was likewise denied for being in violation of the rules and for being not meritorious.[36] On February 28, 1992, the Catungals filed a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition[37] with the Court of Appeals, questioning the denial of their motion to dismiss and the order of default. This was docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 27565.
	GR No. 146839 2011-03-23	ROLANDO T. CATUNGAL v. ANGEL S. RODRIGUEZ LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
On December 23, 1991, the Catungals filed a motion for reconsideration[33] of the December 20, 1991 Order denying their Urgent Motion to Dismiss but the trial court denied reconsideration in an Order dated February 3, 1992.[34] Undeterred, the Catungals subsequently filed a Motion to Lift and to Set Aside Order of Default[35] but it was likewise denied for being in violation of the rules and for being not meritorious.[36] On February 28, 1992, the Catungals filed a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition[37] with the Court of Appeals, questioning the denial of their motion to dismiss and the order of default. This was docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 27565.