This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-08-29 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Indeed, when the defendant fails to deny specifically and under oath the due execution and genuineness of a document copied in a complaint, the plaintiff need not prove that fact as it is considered admitted by the defendant.[35] In the case of Asia Banking Corporation v. Walter E. Olsen & Co.,[36] this Court held that | |||||
|
2005-07-29 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Indeed, when the defendant fails to deny specifically and under oath the due execution and genuineness of a document copied in a complaint, the plaintiff need not prove that fact as it is considered admitted by the defendant.[35] In the case of Asia Banking Corporation v. Walter E. Olsen & Co.,[36] this Court held that - | |||||