You're currently signed in as:
User

FABIOLA SEVERINO v. GUILLERMO SEVERINO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2003-03-20
BELLOSILLO, J.
Thus it has been held that an attorney or any other person occupying fiduciary relations respecting property or persons is utterly disabled from acquiring for his own benefit the property committed to his custody for management.[16] This rule is entirely independent of whether fraud has intervened as in fact no fraud need be shown; no excuse will be heard from an attorney because the rule stands on the moral obligation to refrain from placing oneself in positions that ordinarily excite conflict between self-interest and integrity.