This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-08-28 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| As for the four allegedly marked ballots, he contends that the same are indeed marked ballots, considering that the words papag, bangus, and kalabasa were written amidst the names of different candidates for Kagawads, and that the said words are irrelevant, impertinent and unnecessary.[28] He further argues that writing these irrelevant words or expressions after or amidst the names of candidates voids the ballot for being marked.[29] He adds that a ballot bearing an irrelevant epithet after the name of a candidate should also be invalidated.[30] | |||||