Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
http://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c20d7?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PROVINCIA DEL SANTISIMO NOMBRE DE JESUS DE FLLIPINAS v. LEON DEL REY](http://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c20d7?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c20d7}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 32813, Nov 05, 1930 ]

PROVINCIA DEL SANTISIMO NOMBRE DE JESUS DE FLLIPINAS v. LEON DEL REY +

DECISION

55 Phil 163

[ G.R. No. 32813, November 05, 1930 ]

PROVINCIA DEL SANTISIMO NOMBRE DE JESUS DE FLLIPINAS, DE LA ORDEN DE ERMITAƑOS DE NUESTRO PADRE SAN AGUSTIN, VULGARMENTE CONOCIDA POR "CORPORACION DE PP. AGUSTINOS," PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LEON DEL REY, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

OSTRAND, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage executed by the defendant in favor of the Compania Agrieola de Ultramar. The mortgage was afterwards transferred to the herein plaintiff, and the defendant failing to fulfill the terms of the mortgage, the present action was brought. The mortgaged property is a tract of land situated in the barrio of Ermitaño, municipality of San Juan del Monte, Province of Rizal, and contains an area of 19,959 square meters.

Upon appeal, the mortgagor's contention is that the court below exceeded its jurisdiction and discretion in denying a motion for the continuance of the trial of the case in order to give him an opportunity to prepare his evidence. That contention cannot be sustained. The continuance of trials lays largely in the discretion of the court, and we can find no indication that the judge presiding over the court below abused his discretion. The action was brought on August 19, 1928, and the trial did not take place until a year afterwards. It would seem that the defendant had ample time to prepare his evidence, if any he had.

The appealed judgment is affirmed, with the costs against the appellant. So ordered.

Avanceña, C. J., Johnson, Street, Malcolm, Villamor, Johns, Romualdez and Villa-Real, JJ., concur.


tags